By Tim Gavin and Lisa Pelly
Originally published by the Yakima Herald, November 5, 2016
Rep. Dan Newhouse held a listening session on the state of public lands on Oct. 12 in Wenatchee.
Newhouse was joined by Rep. Rob Bishop, Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Natural Resources, who has been a leading critic of public land management agencies and part of the national discussion about the transfer of our nation’s public lands.
The listening session focused on many of the challenges facing our public lands, yet there was little talk about transferring our public lands. This is a breath of fresh air. Transfer or sale of America’s public lands is not a solution to public land management challenges. The answer is public land users and state and federal agencies working together to craft collaborative solutions for America’s public lands.
The plan was agreed upon by a diverse coalition of conservation groups, irrigation, farmers, sportsmen and women, local, state, and federal governments and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation. We’ve shown that by working collaboratively at a watershed level, we can craft and implement long term solutions.
Similarly, public land issues like firefighting budgets, road maintenance, access to public lands, trail clearing, important programs like Payments in Lieu of Taxes, to offset losses in property taxes, and the dwindling funding to manage public lands are the things that we need to work together to solve.
We support the effort to get out into communities to listen and understand these issues — this is the first step. The next step is for Congress to pass widely supported, bipartisan legislation that addresses these challenges. First and foremost, our land management agencies need adequate resources to soundly manage public lands. However, Congress has been unwilling or unable able to pass commonsense legislation to address funding issues like fire borrowing, that is, the practice of raiding agency funds earmarked for other priorities and using them to battle wildfires.
Any honest discussion about federal land management needs to start with ensuring that our agencies have the funding and resources necessary to be good land managers. These are the types of discussions that will lead to real solutions for issues like tackling the backlog of road and trail maintenance, or getting a handle on the massive expenses of fighting wildfires.
In this day and age of divisions and polarization of opinions, being an absolutist begets little progress. We must listen to each other, plan and find collaborative ways to tackle 21st century land management challenges.
Transferring or selling public lands is and never will be the answer. Only level-headed and thoughtful solutions will begin to address the challenges we face.